Mind + Muscle

technical minds + legal muscle

Bracket
Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox
Wright book sidebar
Jon Wright is an editor of Patent Office Litigation
 
Named 2013 - 2016 "IP Star" by Managing Intellectual Property

Jon E. Wright

Mind + Muscle

Jon E. Wright

Director

 

Mr. Wright chairs the firm’s appellate practice, and co-chairs its PTO litigation practice. He focuses primarily on contested proceedings before the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and on appeals of those cases to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He is a recognized leader in inter partes review practice where there is co-pending district court litigation or a USITC investigation. He is familiar with the challenges faced by both patent owners and petitioners in these complex proceedings, often working closely with trial counsel as part of an inter-disciplinary team.

Mr. Wright has been lead or back-up counsel in over sixty inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, mostly on behalf of patent owners. In one of the earliest success stories for patent owners, Mr. Wright successfully defended a set of four IPRs, securing confirmation of all challenged claims in the digital rights management space. More recently, Mr. Wright secured key non-institution decisions in four IPRs on two patents for a Fortune 500 IT company, and in two IPRs on one patent for an innovator medical device company.

The involved technologies in Mr. Wright's IPR cases include semiconductor design and fabrication, digital rights management, RFID, computer networking, optical switches, medical devices, and stray voltage detection technologies. Prior to the new AIA proceedings, Mr. Wright represented patent owners in over fifty inter partes and ex parte reexaminations involving concurrent district court or USITC proceedings.

Mr. Wright also has extensive appellate experience at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Prior to joining Sterne Kessler, Mr. Wright clerked at the Federal Circuit for the Honorable Alvin A. Schall. He has been either lead counsel or second chair in over a dozen appeals to the Federal Circuit. Mr. Wright recently secured affirmance of a PTAB decision for a Fortune 500 global communications company.

Mr. Wright is also an editor of Patent Office Litigation, a two-volume set focused on the new contested proceedings under the America Invents Act published in 2012 by Thomson Reuters Westlaw. This book examines how the proceedings interact with other aspects of patent procurement and enforcement, and delivers practical analysis and advice.

Prior to focusing on contested proceedings, Mr. Wright had extensive experience in the preparation and prosecution of patent applications before the USPTO in technologies ranging from software, hardware (analog and digital), communications, wireless devices and systems, networking, database management, computer memory devices, semiconductor manufacturing, computer graphics and electrical power systems including nuclear technology.

While at George Mason University School of Law, Mr. Wright was the Managing Editor of the George Mason Law Review. Before law school, Mr. Wright was a Lieutenant in the U.S. Navy Submarine Force. His tour included three years on the nuclear powered fast attack submarine USS TAUTOG (SSN 639), and two years with COMSUBGRU 7 in Yokosuka, Japan. In addition to being a qualified Naval Nuclear Engineer, Mr. Wright also has private industry experience where he worked in semiconductor manufacturing for industry leader International Business Machines.

Inter Partes Reviews

  • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 7,225,160 (IPR2013-00134) – secured confirmation of asserted claims at trial initiation phase.
  • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,058,045 (IPR2014-00113) – secured non-institution decision.
  • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,359,102 (IPR2015-01203, -01204) – secured non-institution decisions for innovator medical device company.
  • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,377, 577 (IPR2015-00973) – secured non-institution decisions for Fortune 500 IT company.
  • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 7,724,879 (IPR2013-00296) – secured cancellation of all challenged claims for Fortune 500 global communications company.

Federal Circuit Appellate Litigation

  • AIP Acquisition LLC v. Level 3 Communications: Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
  • K/S HIMPP v. Hear-Wear Techs., LLC: Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
  • In re Jung: Appeal from the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences dealing with prima facie anticipation.
  • Taurus IP, LLC v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. et al: Patent enforcement action on behalf of Taurus IP, LLC.
  • Orion IP, LLC v. Hyundai Motor America: Patent enforcement action on behalf of Orion IP.
  • Medtronic Inc. v. Guidant Corp.: Patent infringement defense for Medtronic in an appeal related to cardiac pacemakers.
  • Floyd M. Minks v. Polaris Indus. Inc.: Patent infringement defense for Polaris in an appeal related to speed limiting circuits for All Terrain Vehicles.

District Court Litigation

  • Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. (FMC) v. Paddock Laboratories, Inc.: ANDA litigation. (District of Massachusetts)
  • JuxtaComm Technologies, Inc. v. Ascential Software Corp.: Patent infringement defense for Sybase Inc., relating to software for transforming and exchanging data between distributed, heterogeneous computer systems. (Eastern District of Texas)
  • FuzzySharp Technologies Inc. v. ATI Inc.: Patent infringement defense for ATI relating to advanced computer graphics processing methods and procedures. (Northern District of California)
  • Stream Theory v. Exent Technologies Inc.: Patent infringement defense for Exent relating to streaming applications over the internet. (Central District of California)

Reexamination

  • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. 6,470,405 entitled “Protocol for Communication with Dynamic Memory” on behalf of patent owner. (Control No. 95/001,178)
  • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. 7,360,050 entitled “Integrated Circuit Memory Device Having Delayed Write Capability” on behalf of patent owner. (Control No. 95/001,201)
  • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. U.S. Patent No. 90/009,403 entitled "Discrete-Time Sampling of Data for Use in Switching Regulators" on behalf of patent owner. (Control No. 90/009,403)
  • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. 5,774,670 entitled "Persistent Client State in a Hypertext Transfer Protocol Based Client-Server System" on behalf of third party requester. (Control No. 90/011,106)
  • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. 5,490,216 entitled "System for Software Registration" on behalf of patent owner. (Control No. 90/010,831)
  • Representative Matters

      Inter Partes Reviews

      • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 7,225,160 (IPR2013-00134) – secured confirmation of asserted claims at trial initiation phase.
      • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,058,045 (IPR2014-00113) – secured non-institution decision.
      • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,359,102 (IPR2015-01203, -01204) – secured non-institution decisions for innovator medical device company.
      • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,377, 577 (IPR2015-00973) – secured non-institution decisions for Fortune 500 IT company.
      • Inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 7,724,879 (IPR2013-00296) – secured cancellation of all challenged claims for Fortune 500 global communications company.

      Federal Circuit Appellate Litigation

      • AIP Acquisition LLC v. Level 3 Communications: Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
      • K/S HIMPP v. Hear-Wear Techs., LLC: Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
      • In re Jung: Appeal from the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences dealing with prima facie anticipation.
      • Taurus IP, LLC v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. et al: Patent enforcement action on behalf of Taurus IP, LLC.
      • Orion IP, LLC v. Hyundai Motor America: Patent enforcement action on behalf of Orion IP.
      • Medtronic Inc. v. Guidant Corp.: Patent infringement defense for Medtronic in an appeal related to cardiac pacemakers.
      • Floyd M. Minks v. Polaris Indus. Inc.: Patent infringement defense for Polaris in an appeal related to speed limiting circuits for All Terrain Vehicles.

      District Court Litigation

      • Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. (FMC) v. Paddock Laboratories, Inc.: ANDA litigation. (District of Massachusetts)
      • JuxtaComm Technologies, Inc. v. Ascential Software Corp.: Patent infringement defense for Sybase Inc., relating to software for transforming and exchanging data between distributed, heterogeneous computer systems. (Eastern District of Texas)
      • FuzzySharp Technologies Inc. v. ATI Inc.: Patent infringement defense for ATI relating to advanced computer graphics processing methods and procedures. (Northern District of California)
      • Stream Theory v. Exent Technologies Inc.: Patent infringement defense for Exent relating to streaming applications over the internet. (Central District of California)

      Reexamination

      • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. 6,470,405 entitled “Protocol for Communication with Dynamic Memory” on behalf of patent owner. (Control No. 95/001,178)
      • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. 7,360,050 entitled “Integrated Circuit Memory Device Having Delayed Write Capability” on behalf of patent owner. (Control No. 95/001,201)
      • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. U.S. Patent No. 90/009,403 entitled "Discrete-Time Sampling of Data for Use in Switching Regulators" on behalf of patent owner. (Control No. 90/009,403)
      • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. 5,774,670 entitled "Persistent Client State in a Hypertext Transfer Protocol Based Client-Server System" on behalf of third party requester. (Control No. 90/011,106)
      • Reexam of U.S. Patent No. 5,490,216 entitled "System for Software Registration" on behalf of patent owner. (Control No. 90/010,831)
  • Admissions
      • District of Columbia

      • United States Patent and Trademark Office

      • Virginia

      • Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

      • Federal District Court for the District of Columbia

  • Education
    • J.D., George Mason University magna cum laude

    • B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of Vermont

    X

    Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. will not be considered confidential or privileged, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Sterne Kessler.  If you are not already a client of Sterne Kessler, do not include any confidential information in this message.